Press "Enter" to skip to content

Scientists assume Some Supermassive black holes didn’t begin as Stars

Despite the actual fact that scientists currently have a true image of a supermassive black hole, they still have lots of questions on the objects. Now, astrophysicists at Western University could have an explanation for a way some black holes are formed In research published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters today, Shantanu Basu and Arpan Das recommend that not all black holes emerge from star remnants. Their model could facilitate scientists justify the formation of extraordinarily huge black holes a very early stage of the universe’s development.

In simple terms, the model recommends that supermassive black holes formed “very, very rapidly over very, very short phases of time” and then stopped abruptly. “Supermassive black holes only had a short period where they were able to grow fast and then at some point, because of all the radiation in the universe created by other black holes and stars, their production came to a halt,” Basu said. So far, the present understanding was that stellar-mass black holes form when the center of a massive star collapses in on itself. In difference, Basu and Das suggest that some black holes instigate from direct-collapses, not stellar remnants.

According to the scientists, several supermassive black holes billions of times more enormous than the Sun have been revealed in the last decade. Researchers believe they formed within 800 million years of the Big Bang, but that defies our understanding of black hole creation and growth. This new direct-collapse scenario could offer a clarification for how these initial supermassive black holes formed.